Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Desensitization in Prime Time


We were on vacation last week – as far away as we felt we could be during the trial, which was to Lake Tahoe – and for the most part it was great. The ability to stretch their doses out throughout the day (since we were with them all day) was incredibly helpful. There was still frequent resistance from Aviv, who continues to not want to eat his dose. The promise of being able to eat any breakfast food (after morning dose), any lunch food or snacks (after afternoon dose), and any dinner food (after evening dose) is motivating for Aviv, and that’s what kept him on track. Ari continues to eat his dose on schedule, because that’s what he’s supposed to do, and that’s the kid that he is. He was very surprised when a conversation about his ability to eat any nuts, any time, came up… “You mean I can eat anything? Even something with nuts in it?”, he asked incredulously. I reminded him that he graduated from updosing, and was now in maintenance mode, which meant that he had to have his dose each day, but also that he could eat anything else. I could almost see the wheels turning in his head as he processed this information. “What do you want to eat? Are there things with nuts you want to have?”, I asked. “I don’t know…” was all he could meekly reply, backing away, a bit overwhelmed by the possibilities.

 They continued to experience firsts… their first Nestle chocolate ice cream bars, picking out candy from bulk bins at a candy store… and we continued to be creative with doses… heating up Aviv’s dose cookie on the dashboard of our car while driving, making ice cream sandwiches with the dose cookies, and making chocolate covered dose bars (verdict: Ari found them delicious; Aviv went on a hunger strike). When Aviv digs his heels in, it’s tough. He really hated the dose bar, resulting in a lot of tears, a lot of screams (“I hate you, and I hate dose!”), no other food, and finally at 7pm, after two hours of coaxing, he finally choked it down. Orr normally bakes dose treats for them every four days, but rather than put anyone through that pain again, he made a new batch of dose treats that night for Aviv. For what it’s worth, since there was a lot left over, I ate some of the dose bar and found it to be very intense. I love chocolate and I love nuts (or used to, before all of this), but I don’t know that I could eat the full dose bars. I really don’t know how they’re doing this.


Ari came running into our room tonight, excitedly calling to me, “Ima! Can I take off my bracelet now, since I’m not allergic to nuts anymore?” I looked from his expectant face to his worn Medic-ID bracelet that he’s had on his little wrist since he was two, which informs the world of his allergies, blood type and to call 911, and my heart sank a bit for him. He’s still trying to figure out what all of this means, what his new ‘status’ is, what he can do now… and who can blame him? I’m trying to figure it out, too. I told him that Dr. Nadeau wants him to keep wearing his bracelet until more time passes and he’s been through more testing, so she can confirm that his body continues to remember what it was taught about not being allergic. He asked if that meant he had to wear it until he was 9 – two years (the length of the study) from now. I told him it was a great question and that he should ask her when he sees her next. He nodded and then asked when the study would REALLY be over, as he doesn’t want to have to eat his dose forever. Who can blame him? I told him that Dr. Nadeau and others are doing lots of research to figure out how long people need to keep eating their dose, and until then, he needs to keep eating it. That was not what he wanted to hear, but that is certainly the state of the medical research.

Speaking of, you may have seen stories recently about food allergy desensitization work (or oral immunotherapy “OIT”) in the news, as a new study was published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine by a colleague of Dr. Nadeau’s (and pioneer in this space), Dr. Wesley Burks, about the egg allergy desensitization trial that he conducted. The story was picked up by CNN, Time and others, all of whom presented the research as very exciting and a cause for optimism. I couldn’t help but be excited, too, thinking this treatment path is finally ‘reaching prime time’, which means both the recognition of its efficacy, as well as support, will hopefully increase. Even the Mayo Clinic’s website (under Food Allergies: Experimental Treatments) discusses OIT as looking ‘promising’ as a treatment. As I read aloud the articles to Orr and others last week, Ari & Aviv listened intently. We know firsthand that OIT works; we live it every day! That’s not news to us. The big wildcard is whether the immunity can be sustained without the daily dose. In Dr. Burks’ study, after desensitizing 75% of the patients who did the egg OIT over a period of 22 months, the patients were then told to stop taking their daily dose (or any egg consumption) for 4-6 weeks. After that, only 28% passed their oral food challenge. So while it appears that some continued ingestion is needed to maintain the immunity that can be built up through OIT, only time (and more research) will tell how much and how often. So where does that leave us? For now, continuing on with large daily doses, to be sure. It’s still a little unclear to me how we’re to handle school in another month… assuming Aviv graduates into maintenance mode next month without issue, do they need a nut free classroom, or not? Can they eat any food given to them when we’re not around? So far Dr. Nadeau has recommend that we don’t change the protocols in place at school, but it could be confusing for some (including A&A) to send them to school with their doses (as we’ll need to do, in order for them to spread out the doses throughout the day), but then have other restrictions. This is an area we’ll continue to explore with her. It’s not just an issue of confusion or logistical challenges; it’s one of inclusion and fitting in. Safety first, to be sure, but we’d like to ease the restrictions for them where we can.
---

A friend who I hadn’t seen in a while asked me today if we decided to stay in the trial. Last time I spoke with her, we were in the middle of an especially rough patch with the boys’ ingestion and we weren’t sure we had the strength to continue. In explaining to her why we decided to persevere, I told her that while sticking with the daily doses is hard, living with severe food allergies is harder, and if I have to pick which hard thing to do, I’m going to pick the hard thing that protects them, rather than the hard thing that puts them back at risk with every touch of a library book or door handle. Such are the decisions we make all the time, right? Which hard choice is the best one for our kids/our families? That’s the most important job we have as parents. So with that in mind, tomorrow Aviv heads back to Stanford for another updose - likely a 25% increase from 14,000mg to 17,500mg – and I can only imagine how he’s going to react to eating more. The good news is that while he’s intellectually opposed to the doses, his body seems to be tolerating them just fine, without any reactions. There’s so much that he understands beyond his five years, but this is one of the areas where we just have to make the tough decisions for him, push him to continue, validate his emotions when they spill over, and encourage him along the way until he’s able to understand the value and motivate himself.

No comments:

Post a Comment